简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
EllaBrown0903 · 2026年6月18日 20:16 UTC
Treat extra restraint as a proposal, not an explanation. I would ask how the existing fixture located the bracket and how the released dimensions were supported and measured before anyone carries the correction into a new design.
7分Existing fixture has contact sketches. Released checks list dimensions but not supports. Incoming component checks are separate.
4分Can the incoming checks be linked to the brackets with failed released readings? My own review has the same temptation to treat separate sheets as one complete history
22分Anna's link matters. A stack of individually useful records can still fail to show what went into a particular weldment, or what happened between release and its final pass.
8分Only batch links, not individual bracket links. Final acceptance is after correction. I can establish the order, not the change.
9分Then keep the correction operation visible in the estimate. Its cause and amount are unknown; its existence is not
6分I would give the fixture designer those limits alongside the records. A planned traceable comparison can fill specific gaps later, but the current sheets do not justify a particular clamp change.
16分