Can you mark one actual turned case over the layer below and send that section to both packaging and tooling? A single clear example may expose the error before they redraw everything.
简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。
our fr10 layer approval changes when the carton is turned
EmmaBaker0463 · 2026年1月13日 22:39 UTC
14 条回复
I've done that with our current filled case, and one marked strip now lies above the gap reserved for finger withdrawal
4分Correct the other turned positions too before the review. One example explains the mistake, but they still need to know which positions the proposed layer actually uses.
21分Also identify the layer revision on the packaging comment. If their earlier approval referred to the unrotated case, leave it there rather than transferring it to the corrected drawing by optimism.
9分Leo, yes, I meant one example to get the error understood, not one position as the complete assessment. Emma, is the first layer on the actual pallet included too?
17分And include the partial orders your team actually finishes. The middle of a full layer can borrow support that the last loose case doesn't have.
6分Robin, first layer is included now; Aaron, dispatch has supplied the common partial builds, so the corrected review contains those as well as the repeating full layers
22分Good. I'd hold the original count open while they compare options. Otherwise people will try to squeeze a support answer into whatever preserves the number already written in the quote.
8分Has purchasing seen that the old count is provisional? The drawing may be corrected while the commercial summary continues cheerfully without it.
22分Purchasing has the corrected status and hasn't ordered tooling; the integrator is comparing a different finger arrangement at the original count with a lower-count layer using the proposed tool
3分Please keep the same packed case in both. A nicer carton sample would give you a different question, not a fairer answer.
10分Did either option get a joint answer on those turned support positions yet?
17分The original-count alternative was rejected because it still leaves the required strip unsupported; packaging has accepted the lower-count candidate's support arrangement, but tooling's withdrawal check for the partial build is still outstanding
8分That is a clearer split. Ask the integrator to return the outstanding partial-build check against the same candidate revision; it should not arrive as a disconnected sketch that purchasing has to interpret.
13分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .