简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Photos taken, packaging kept, robot still off - loading lightweight fixtures

EllaAllen0294 · 2026年5月22日 14:20 UTC

回复讨论
EL
EllaAllen0294
Our Fairino FR10 arrived from an unnamed seller in China in a crate with a crushed corner and shifted internal supports. I can see damage near the arm connector housing. We bought it for loading lightweight fixtures; I haven't powered it. I've photographed the delivery and kept the packaging, but the seller's reply just says to switch it on.

18 条回复

TO
TobyAllen0318

Check whether your photographs include the shipment label and supports as well as a wider view of the damaged area. That context would help a reviewer interpret the visible condition.

25
EL
EllaAllen0294

@TobyAllen0318 Yes. I've got the crushed corner and shifted restraint before unpacking, plus wider photos around the arm connector housing. I kept the delivery paperwork too.

20
TO
TobyAllen0318

@EllaAllen0294 Provide the photographs and delivery details, asking for qualified assessment and suitable handling instructions. Keep the equipment off while the seller's power-on suggestion lacks an inspection procedure.

14
EL
EllaAllen0294

Should I call it transport damage? I know how it looked on arrival, not where the knock happened.

20
CH
ChloeBrooks0831

Describe the arrival condition first. You don't need to solve who caused it to report the crushed corner and visible marks.

6
TO
TobyAllen0318

The restraint displacement suggests that an impact reached the equipment itself. Include that image in the assessment request alongside the external crate photographs.

25
AL
AlexArcher0385

It shows a shifted restraint. We don't know the force path or when it moved. Don't turn the photograph into a diagnosis

8
TO
TobyAllen0318

You're right; my interpretation went beyond the photograph. The restraint displacement should be reported as an observation for the assessor to evaluate.

20
NA
NadiaAli0204

@TobyAllen0318 Would switching it on at least tell you if it's broken?

0
TO
TobyAllen0318

@NadiaAli0204 Even successful startup would leave possible hidden damage unanswered. The visible condition warrants an agreed assessment method before the equipment is energized.

17
EL
EllaAllen0294

@TobyAllen0318 That's my worry. I don't want 'it lights up' becoming the entire condition report. It's staying off.

8
CH
ChloeBrooks0831

@EllaAllen0294 On a separate machine delivery of mine, the wide shots were more useful than my dramatic close-up. The reviewer needed to know where the mark sat.

16
EL
EllaAllen0294

@ChloeBrooks0831 Would labelling the images help, or should I leave the originals alone?

15
CH
ChloeBrooks0831

@EllaAllen0294 Keep the originals and label copies. Simple filenames or arrows can help, as long as they don't cover the detail you're asking them to inspect.

15
AL
AlexArcher0385

Keep arrival observations distinct from anything found during unpacking. Same report is fine; pretending you saw it all at the door isn't

4
EL
EllaAllen0294

@AlexArcher0385 My receipt note covers the crate condition. The closer equipment photos came from unpacking. I'll keep that distinction in the captions.

7
EL
EllaAllen0294

I've organized the arrival photos and can request a specific condition assessment. Our equipment remains unpowered because that assessment hasn't happened.

2
TO
TobyAllen0318

@EllaAllen0294 Your observations should help define the assessment, while leaving the equipment off reflects the work still needed.

14

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。