I'm preparing fixture information for a UR5e welding review. An old jig sheet records alignment under restraint, and a separate inspection sheet records an angle after correction. They share a batch number but no individual part identifiers. I cannot tell whether they describe the same bracket, despite being stapled together.
Two bracket checks with no common part identifier
EricBailey · 2025年7月5日 03:10 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
6 条回复
回复 EricBailey
Leave them as separate evidence. Stapling is not traceability, and guessing a before-and-after pair could send the new fixture design in the wrong direction.
14分I've separated them in the summary. Both use bracket revision H, but the first sheet names fixture J2 and the inspection sheet gives no fixture. I have asked quality whether another record connects them.
12分回复 EricBailey
Do they have an untouched released-part result anywhere? That would be more useful than trying to reverse-engineer what the correction achieved.
16分回复 EricBailey
Who is supposed to explain the correction to the new operators?
9分Good question. A missing method can turn into someone informally showing each shift a different trick. Eric, is the correction actually included in the proposed training?
13分No. Training currently covers the robot sequence only. I've raised the missing process explanation with the welding lead. Quality has found another final report, but still no measurement from before correction, so that gap remains.
9分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .