Our FR10 inspection proposal has one bezel that everyone keeps calling scratched because of a moving bright band. Quality found no mark there. On a different bezel, a real edge scratch almost disappears with the lighting change that removes the band. I don't reckon a prettier picture is getting us very far. What should we compare next?
Why does our nicer bezel picture hide the scratch?
HenryArcher0351 · 2026年3月1日 20:26 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
8 条回复
AL
Are you comparing both bezels in the same seating and view, Henry, or adjusting each until the image looks good?
7分回复 AlexCell
Same holder, but the person taking the second set nudged the scratched bezel to improve the picture. So no, not quite the same presentation. I missed that when I put the images side by side.
7分Repeat the comparison without that individual rescue, because otherwise the proposed station has a very helpful person in it whom nobody has included in the design.
12分Use the accepted bezel and the scratched one together for each candidate arrangement, Henry, and keep the full edge visible; you can learn quite a lot before another round of threshold changes.
-5分We repeated with both seated normally. The lighting arrangement that reduces the band still loses the edge scratch. A second view shows it, but we have not checked what adding that view does to the complete inspection.
7分AL
Would the second view require a different held position, Henry, or only a change in the imaging arrangement?
2分回复 AlexCell
Keep the original view in the comparison too, Alex; a second view might add what is missing rather than replace the one that sees the centre.
19分Alex, it needs a different held position in the current proposal. Farah, yes, we'd keep both views. I have asked the integrator to include that extra presentation in the comparison before we get attached to it.
24分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .