简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Our pickup points keep needing nudges

NoahChan1064 · 2026年7月21日 18:17 UTC

回复讨论
NO
NoahChan1064
Our setup uses Fairino FR10 for tray-to-fixture transfer with a rigid spacer block in a compact parts transfer workshop. We've repeatedly adjusted pickup points as handling becomes unreliable. Although the tray appears unchanged, the grip no longer looks as square. I'd like an inspection sequence that helps us identify the cause before making further teaching changes or attributing it to the arm.

15 条回复

ZA
ZaraAdams0134

Does the angle change before contact or as the fingers close? Existing footage may help you locate where things start going wrong.

3
NO
NoahChan1064

Reviewing the recording, I can see consistent seating in the checked fixture before pickup. The workpiece changes angle during gripping rather than arriving in that position.

23
ZA
ZaraAdams0134

@NoahChan1064 Keep a copy of the current configuration and hold off on further coordinate changes. Under the appropriate isolation procedure, maintenance can use the observed rotation to focus inspection on tooling contact, mounting and tray seating.

8
NO
NoahChan1064

@ZaraAdams0134 I've checked the maintenance history and found a pad replacement preceding the initial pickup-point correction. That establishes a relevant sequence of changes to investigate.

10
ZA
ZaraAdams0134

That sounds like the pad replacement caused it. Check the installation against the specified arrangement.

16
HE
HenryBarnes0525

Timing isn't enough to call it the cause. Check the pads, yes, but don't let one maintenance entry explain away fixture variation.

21
ZA
ZaraAdams0134

Agreed, I called it too early. Treat the replacement as a lead; verify installation and contact condition alongside tray location before assigning the cause.

2
PR
PriyaBrown0916

My separate handling setup had both worn gripping surfaces and variation in tray seating. Coordinate corrections alone gave inconsistent results because they didn't address either underlying condition.

5
NO
NoahChan1064

With multiple point changes already in our history, I'm unsure how to distinguish tooling and tray effects. How did you structure that comparison on your setup?

22
PR
PriyaBrown0916

For my setup, a documented reference configuration anchored the investigation while maintenance assessed individual conditions. Discovering wear didn't mean we automatically restored older pickup coordinates.

7
TH
TheoChen1193

@PriyaBrown0916 Why not just go back to the original points once the gripper's checked? Aren't those the good ones?

8
ZA
ZaraAdams0134

Only if they match the verified setup. Tooling, frames or presentation may have changed; your responsible technician should compare the configuration before any supervised validation.

9
NO
NoahChan1064

The relationship between the initial points and the present setup hasn't been verified. I'm retaining the current configuration instead of assuming the original positions would restore a known condition.

16
NO
NoahChan1064

The pre-contact and gripping observations have narrowed where the symptom develops. We haven't established an accepted remedy, so I'm holding further coordinate adjustments during the investigation.

11
ZA
ZaraAdams0134

@NoahChan1064 Knowing that the angle changes during gripping helps focus the work, but it doesn't by itself establish an accepted correction.

18

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。