简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
TobyAllen0318 · 2025年6月7日 14:44 UTC
Get both sets under the same light. Otherwise you could spend money making a less photogenic mark.
17分Thanks Ella, I've asked for the actual pieces back as well, with the trial pad type written on each bag.
24分Include an untouched housing. Was that cloudy patch there before either gripper touched it?
21分I'd check release too. We tried a soft contact that looked lovely on the part, then had to wait for the part to peel off it. The operator was not impressed.
15分Was that tack from the material, or a pad shape problem?
11分The untouched piece looks clear beside both trial pieces now they're here; I can see the cloudy patch on the soft-pad one without hunting for it.
24分How are you judging appearance in production? A patch you can find under a bench lamp might not be a customer reject. Someone has to settle that before the pad contest continues.
12分We once rejected a batch for a rub our customer reference actually allowed. Put their acceptable sample beside yours, if you have one; it saves a surprisingly awkward conversation later
15分Ella, it was tack on ours. A different pad material released better with the same shape. I wouldn't rule out Toby's softer option just because ours was sticky.
18分We've got a customer sample with light contact marks allowed, and our finish inspector says the cloudy patch is worse; keeping the original contact for now while the toolmaker looks at its jaw lines.
6分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .