Existing fixture loading station: Different label suffix, different mounting arrangement

MeiChan1125 · 2026年9月3日 00:44 UTC

回复讨论

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

ME
MeiChan1125
I ordered Fairino FR10 from an unnamed seller in China after they confirmed a configuration against our fixture drawing. The delivered label has a different suffix, and the interface around the tool interface bracket looks different from that drawing. The seller says equivalent but hasn't provided a comparison. I've left our tooling unfitted and waited 23 days for clarification. We're working at an existing fixture loading station.

10 条回复

JA
JasperAbbott0029

@MeiChan1125 Do you've the seller's confirmation, delivered identification label, and fixture drawing available together? Comparing those would identify the discrepancy without assuming what the suffix means.

16分
ME
MeiChan1125

I've the prepayment confirmation referring to our drawing and the different delivered identifier. Our unpacking photographs also show the interface as received, with no tooling installed.

8分
JA
JasperAbbott0029

@MeiChan1125 Send that comparison and ask for the applicable interface drawing for the delivered configuration. Leave the tooling unfitted while compatibility is checked.

20分
ME
MeiChan1125

Can I describe this as the wrong revision based on the suffix alone? I'd prefer not to make the dispute depend on an unverified interpretation of the identifier.

11分
RO
RobinArcher0425

Call it a configuration discrepancy. Quote both identifiers and show the visible interface difference. That gives them two concrete things to explain.

16分
JA
JasperAbbott0029

A matching interface drawing would establish that the delivered configuration is compatible with your fixture. Request that document to support the seller's equivalence claim.

12分
HA
HanaAbbott0013

@JasperAbbott0029 The interface drawing could address physical fit, but it wouldn't by itself establish compatibility for all connections and application requirements.

15分
JA
JasperAbbott0029

I overstated what that document would establish. The drawing can help resolve physical fit, while the remaining compatibility questions need assessment against your intended configuration and application.

15分
ME
MeiChan1125

I've accepted the delivered interface after a completed configuration comparison and qualified review against our stated fixture requirements. That resolves this discrepancy for us, with installation checks still required.

19分
JA
JasperAbbott0029

Your stated fixture requirements now have supporting review, and you've kept the outstanding installation work clear.

21分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 和 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。