@NinaBrown0936 In the footage, it sits consistently in the checked fixture and turns during gripping. So the crooked position isn't there at the start.

Preserve the current settings and pause further nudges. Have maintenance inspect finger mounting, contact surfaces and tray seating under the proper isolation procedure, using that observation to guide the checks.

@NinaBrown0936 The maintenance notes show contact pads were replaced before the first point adjustment. That's the first useful clue I've found in the history.

The timing suggests the replacement is responsible. I'd check whether the pads were installed in the specified configuration.

Timing isn't enough to call it the cause. Check the pads, yes, but don't let one maintenance entry explain away fixture variation.

Agreed, I called it too early. Treat the replacement as a lead; verify installation and contact condition alongside tray location before assigning the cause.

@NinaBrown0936 My separate handling setup had both worn gripping surfaces and variation in tray seating. Coordinate corrections alone gave inconsistent results because they didn't address either underlying condition.

I've settled the inspection route: preserve the settings, stop nudging points and have maintenance check the grip and seating. Any restart of trials depends on that assessment; I haven't pinned this on the arm.

That answers the inspection-order question. Keeping the arm diagnosis open fits what your observation actually shows.