Our proposed pallet layer has gaps which suit the fingers and apparently don't suit the carton base. Packaging says support the reinforced ends; the alternating top view never shows those ends underneath. I want a joint check before anyone mistakes a full-looking pallet for a supported one.
Which carton edges does this UR5e layer actually support?
LinBaker0444 · 2025年10月11日 22:58 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
7 条回复
回复 LinBaker0444
An underside section helped expose this on our comparison. Put the marked support areas and finger withdrawal on the same revision, then ask packaging which positions they can accept. Don't let the section replace checking the whole layer sequence.
13分I've got the underside drawing now. One rotated end sits right over a finger channel. Tooling says closing the channel would trap the fingers, which makes a joint review fairly unavoidable.
9分回复 LinBaker0444
Could a different placement order leave the fingers room without that permanent channel, or has tooling already ruled that out?
14分Gabriel, that is worth asking, though changing the order won't help if the tool needs the channel beneath the final carton itself. We need their actual withdrawal, not an imagined convenient one.
-1分Yes, I was asking for another candidate, not suggesting the channel could just disappear; has tooling answered?
9分They say the current fingers need that space under the last carton too. Different sequence alone won't do it. A lower-count layer is being compared with a different tool approach; neither has packaging approval.
8分回复 LinBaker0444
Include dispatch in that comparison. More pallets and a different label direction can each add work, even if the robot finds both layouts equally agreeable.
20分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .