简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

What evidence would make these rotated FR10 cartons supportable?

FionaCarter1021 · 2026年8月24日 15:28 UTC

回复讨论
FI
FionaCarter1021
My FR10 box-layer proposal repeats the rotated-over-gap problem; I need a packaging basis, not another placement-order change.

4 条回复

CH
ChenCarter0964

Use the actual filled box and pallet detail for that request. Ask packaging to show where support is required in each orientation, including the dispatch conditions. The tooling reviewer needs that same marked drawing.

20
FI
FionaCarter1021

Sent both the filled-box detail and occupied tool outline. Packaging has not returned a support decision

12
PA
PavelChan1049

Who owns the preferred direction in the first place? A box marking, an internal packing drawing and a warehouse stacking preference aren't interchangeable. I'd chase the person who can explain the load path, not just get a signature beside the arrow.

9
CH
ChenCarter0964

Pavel's distinction is worth resolving. Warehouse can explain its handling requirement, but it should not have to invent a packaging limit just because its drawing is the one everyone has.

-5

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。