简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Why did our accepted cover become three scratch examples?

LuisBrown0956 · 2025年10月5日 15:53 UTC

已关闭
LU
LuisBrown0956
I opened the UR5e camera trial folder and found three reject images of the same polished cover. The bright line is in a different place each time. Quality accepted the physical cover, but the image labels were added by somebody looking only at the screen. We need a useful comparison set before tuning starts.

15 条回复

MI
MinaArcher0424

Retain all three views with their setup details, but remove the unsupported defect labels from the tuning set. Can quality identify the exact cover and confirm its present condition, rather than relying on an earlier acceptance?

17
HA
HarishBrooks0837

I'd put the actual cover under the agreed inspection light before ordering anything. We nearly bought our way out of a reflection nobody could find on the part.

10
FA
FarahAli0243

Harish, yes, but a genuinely marked part can be hard to see under the wrong light too. I would not let one quick glance replace quality's viewing method.

21
HA
HarishBrooks0837

That's why I said agreed light. I'm arguing against a new camera being the first move, not against doing the physical inspection properly.

13
VI
VictorAli0185

Add confirmed subtle rejects to the comparison. A perfect cover and an obvious gouge make a very forgiving test; the faint mark near the viewing limit is often where the proposed image stops being useful.

24
LU
LuisBrown0956

Quality rechecked the identified cover and still accepts it, Mina. Harish and Farah, they used the written viewing method. Victor, they've added a faint scuff reject. The same holder lets the accepted cover sit two ways, which we also need to fix.

18
JO
JonasBrooks0807

Which surfaces locate it? Two seats suggests a holder question before a lighting purchase.

18
RA
RaviCarter0998

Keep the awkward seats documented. They explain why the old examples disagreed.

16
FA
FarahAli0243

Ravi, would you keep those in operator training once the holder changes? I worry about teaching people to accept a seating problem as normal variation.

5
RA
RaviCarter0998

As labelled diagnostic examples, not the new acceptance references.

23
VI
VictorAli0185

Farah, I use that sort of pair to show why seating matters, separately from the pass and fail examples. It works only if the distinction is obvious in the training material.

12
LU
LuisBrown0956

Jonas, the temporary holder located against a loose edge strip; tooling has replaced it with a checked locating arrangement. Repeat images are more consistent. The faint scuff still needs a better lighting comparison, so thresholds remain undecided.

9
HA
HarishBrooks0837

That's progress without pretending the whole inspection is done. Did the holder change make loading more fiddly? A camera trial can miss that when the designer places every cover like it's jewellery.

20
MI
MinaArcher0424

Luis, who owns the reference covers after commissioning? They need condition checks and replacement rules, especially the faint reject everyone will want to handle during training.

24
FA
FarahAli0243

Victor, thanks for explaining the diagnostic pair. I can use that distinction in our changeover training without mixing old holder behaviour into the new acceptance examples.

7

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .