I opened the UR5e camera trial folder and found three reject images of the same polished cover. The bright line is in a different place each time. Quality accepted the physical cover, but the image labels were added by somebody looking only at the screen. We need a useful comparison set before tuning starts.
Retain all three views with their setup details, but remove the unsupported defect labels from the tuning set. Can quality identify the exact cover and confirm its present condition, rather than relying on an earlier acceptance?
I'd put the actual cover under the agreed inspection light before ordering anything. We nearly bought our way out of a reflection nobody could find on the part.
Harish, yes, but a genuinely marked part can be hard to see under the wrong light too. I would not let one quick glance replace quality's viewing method.
Add confirmed subtle rejects to the comparison. A perfect cover and an obvious gouge make a very forgiving test; the faint mark near the viewing limit is often where the proposed image stops being useful.
Quality rechecked the identified cover and still accepts it, Mina. Harish and Farah, they used the written viewing method. Victor, they've added a faint scuff reject. The same holder lets the accepted cover sit two ways, which we also need to fix.
Ravi, would you keep those in operator training once the holder changes? I worry about teaching people to accept a seating problem as normal variation.
Farah, I use that sort of pair to show why seating matters, separately from the pass and fail examples. It works only if the distinction is obvious in the training material.
Jonas, the temporary holder located against a loose edge strip; tooling has replaced it with a checked locating arrangement. Repeat images are more consistent. The faint scuff still needs a better lighting comparison, so thresholds remain undecided.
That's progress without pretending the whole inspection is done. Did the holder change make loading more fiddly? A camera trial can miss that when the designer places every cover like it's jewellery.
Luis, who owns the reference covers after commissioning? They need condition checks and replacement rules, especially the faint reject everyone will want to handle during training.
Victor, thanks for explaining the diagnostic pair. I can use that distinction in our changeover training without mixing old holder behaviour into the new acceptance examples.