简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
JasperChan1073 · 2025年11月29日 14:50 UTC
Have tooling compare that rim with the intended contacts using the retained covers. A repeatable image needs a repeatable seat, not a more determined person pushing the edge down.
24分Tooling has both accepted and rejected samples. One accepted cover catches the lip most often. We kept it in, rather than choose the convenient one.
16分Does that cover's rim differ from the others within the intended incoming range? The designer needs to know whether the holder must accommodate it, not simply remove whichever sample causes the repeat images to vary.
18分Within drawing, confirmed by inspection. Different rim shape within the allowed range. Designer is considering the contact arrangement, no change made yet.
3分Can the loader see when the rim is above the lip?
18分Sam's question matters for any proposed checking method. If they can't see it, a note saying ensure fully seated is not much of a solution.
13分Not from the usual loading side. That's in the design request. No instruction asking operators to confirm an invisible contact.
6分Will the eventual comparison include the loader repeating the placement, rather than the designer carefully arranging each cover? That is where the practical seating uncertainty belongs.
16分Yes, loader included. Thanks Anil. The old images remain labelled by their known setup; new acceptance images wait for the revised-holder comparison.
22分Who keeps the difficult accepted cover from getting mixed back into production?
6分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .