Quality has identified the real scratch on our retained polished cover, but the current UR5e presentation holder hides part of it behind a locating lip; tooling is considering different contacts, and I want our next image comparison to show whether the defect becomes visible without losing a repeatable seat.
Cover reference images with a scratch hidden by the holder
YasminAdams0093 · 2026年1月10日 23:05 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
16 条回复
Compare the actual identified cover in the current and proposed holders, with the complete inspection area recorded. Keep ordinary accepted covers in the same exercise. Moving a lip is useful only if the resulting presentation still shows the features you need.
22分回复 LeoChen1145
And don't replace the awkward scratched cover with an easier reject.
11分Let somebody who didn't design the holder seat the cover. I can fit most things perfectly after watching the designer do it three times.
13分回复 Peter_Blair
Peter's check is useful, though I would have tooling define the intended seat first; otherwise the learner may demonstrate ingenuity when you wanted repeatability.
11分回复 Peter_Blair
The proposed contact arrangement is now drawn and quality has kept the same scratched cover in the comparison, with accepted covers too; Peter, our relief operator is joining the presentation check rather than just watching tooling load it.
14分Can the relief operator see when it isn't fully seated?
17分A small witness gap helped on our bench, but I mean a visible check of the intended seat, not adding a notch wherever a camera happens to like it
15分Show the bad seat as well as the good one. Otherwise every training picture is cheerful.
16分And have somebody own the retained sample set afterwards, because six useful pictures can become six guessed labels again when the parts disappear into the general box.
13分Has quality agreed where those samples will live?
7分Ben, quality is keeping the identified set in its reference drawer; Gabriel, the revised holder leaves the seating check visible, and our relief operator spotted the deliberately incomplete seat in the supervised comparison without a prompt.
14分What happened to the scratch visibility in the complete captures? The seating result is useful, but that's the reason the holder changed.
9分回复 LeoChen1145
The whole marked scratch is visible in the revised presentation captures, while the accepted bright edge remains an accepted reference; repeat presentations are still varying the reflection enough that our vision lead wants another lighting comparison before choosing thresholds.
11分Useful progress. The defect no longer disappears behind a bit of tooling.
12分Did the operator get a copy of the bad-seat example? I'd put it with the handover, not only in the camera engineer's folder.
12分回复 Peter_Blair
Yes, Peter, both seating examples are in the handover draft with the holder identity; thanks for suggesting another pair of hands, it caught a confusing instruction before we spent time adjusting the images around it.
13分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .