The price suits our aluminium-block tray-loading proposal. The evidence does not yet. The seller describes the used UR5e as inspected but has supplied only exterior photographs. I want the existing findings before deciding whether a paid independent inspection is worthwhile.
Refurbished UR5e with an inspection claim but no inspection scope
Aileen_Bowen · 2026年2月1日 10:03 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
6 条回复
回复 Aileen_Bowen
Our pre-shipment review only became useful once the recording identified the actual package and demonstrated the agreed task; for this used arm, would they provide a serial-linked inspection report and a complete list of supplied equipment before you arrange a visit?
7分I have asked. They supplied identification photos and an equipment list, but the inspection field just says functional. No method or results. I have asked who performed it and what they checked.
9分回复 Aileen_Bowen
Get the repair history too. A replaced part is not automatically bad news, and an empty repair-history box is not evidence that nothing was replaced.
-2分回复 Aileen_Bowen
What support would you have after collection? I would price that before treating the low arm price as the cost of owning a working station.
23分回复 Aileen_Bowen
Did the seller answer the inspection-scope question yet, Aileen? Curious whether functional turned into anything you could give an independent inspector.
8分And an independent inspection needs agreed access before the visit. Otherwise you can pay someone competent to stand beside you watching the same exterior photographs become a slideshow.
10分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .