简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

I priced the UR5e hardware and left my colleague the rest

GabrielAli0192 · 2026年8月22日 02:03 UTC

回复讨论
GA
GabrielAli0192
I proposed UR5e tray unloading for small plastic enclosures, but priced the arm and gripper while leaving fixture work and staff effort vague. My colleague is annoyed (fair enough). What small pilot would let us judge the whole job?

17 条回复

AA
AaronBrown0871

Agree the question before the trial: whether the proposed route reduces total work for an identified enclosure mix, within a stated development allowance. Record the current route over the same boundaries, including tray preparation, rejected items and changeover rather than comparing only the transfer motion.

10
OM
OmarAli0230

And let your colleague help set those boundaries. They may be objecting to being assigned hidden work, not to the robot, and a beautifully measured transfer will not answer that complaint.

23
GA
GabrielAli0192

They say tray preparation would land on their team. I hadn't assigned it at all.

9
NO
NoahBaker0455

Record who does that preparation now and what the proposed route changes.

20
LU
LuisAbbott0086

On a handover I helped review, the demonstration began after someone had arranged every part. The operator could repeat the motion but not reproduce the starting condition. Put preparation instructions and who can follow them into your pilot, not just a labour estimate somebody signs after watching.

15
AA
AaronBrown0871

Luis, I agree, though I would bound the documentation effort too. Gabriel is trying to buy evidence for a decision, not commission an entire production system before being allowed to decide whether it is worthwhile.

11
LU
LuisAbbott0086

Yes, enough to repeat the pilot honestly. I did not mean a finished production handover. If the preparation cannot be described yet, record the assistance it actually requires.

-2
OM
OmarAli0230

What would make you stop the pilot? Without that answer, any awkward result can become another fixture tweak charged to enthusiasm.

16
GA
GabrielAli0192

If the agreed preparation needs a new fixture round, we stop and price that separately.

10
NO
NoahBaker0455

And a result with no overall labour reduction should remain a valid answer.

11
GA
GabrielAli0192

Agreed. We are comparing two actual enclosure variants, including switching between them and clearing the trays.

11
AA
AaronBrown0871

Keep development time separate from recurring operator time, while showing both in the decision. Otherwise the first pilot can look permanently expensive because of learning, or permanently cheap because everyone quietly excludes the work that made it run.

16
OM
OmarAli0230

Who observes it while you operate? I would ask your colleague to own the time record, with you checking that assistance and interruptions are noted rather than argued about afterwards.

9
GA
GabrielAli0192

Colleague will record, I operate, and their normal operator reviews the preparation steps before the trial.

18
LU
LuisAbbott0086

Give that operator room to say a step is impractical. The pilot is supposed to discover work, not recruit somebody to certify that your current instructions are reasonable.

4
GA
GabrielAli0192

We both signed the bounded pilot scope today. No purchase approval yet, but the argument now has a test.

16
AA
AaronBrown0871

I would be interested in the preparation result when you have it. That was the cost your original estimate could not answer, even if the robot transfer itself turns out to be straightforward.

14

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。