Our proposed FR10 cover-inspection images have moving bright lines labelled 'scratch'. I can't teach that distinction myself.
Why are we calling every bright line a scratch?
OmarChan1100 · 2026年1月10日 18:15 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
5 条回复
回复 OmarChan1100
Give whoever judges the actual covers the marked image and the numbered cover together, otherwise you're asking them to identify a shiny line from another shiny line
12分回复 LuisAli0260
The covers are numbered, fortunately. Our inspector found one groove but couldn't match the other bright lines.
15分回复 OmarChan1100
Then keep that groove's location marked on the image separately from the changing reflections; can you show the same cover in both presentations?
10分回复 LuisAli0260
Yes. We've removed three incorrect scratch labels. The confirmed groove disappears in one view, which needs sorting before training.
7分回复 OmarChan1100
That's a useful pair to give the imaging person: same cover, known groove, one view hides it. Much easier to explain than 'the camera is inconsistent'
19分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .