简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
JamieArcher0382 · 2025年8月7日 13:28 UTC
What identifies the attempt in those retained values, Jamie, apart from complete being set?
21分A bracket label is present, but the same bracket can be checked again. There is no attempt identifier in the monitor's saved row.
4分Then the label alone won't tell you whether it's a repeated check, and deleting every repeated label would lose real work too.
4分Our screen once put a new time on an old value after reconnect, so I would ask whether yours is an observation time or just when the display woke up
-4分Display wake-up time. Controls has the original result still retained, and quality has held the duplicate row for review. No request was resent by the monitor.
5分Proposed change now includes an attempt identifier and a persistent list of handled results. The existing ambiguous rows remain separate. Controls and software are testing reconnect and repeat inspection as different cases.
2分Include a restart between receiving the result and saving the handled entry; that's where the persistent list can still leave you unsure what happened.
18分Our handover got confused because the screen said complete while the paperwork said awaiting review. What does your operator see for an ambiguous bracket now?
8分A review status, Nina, with the bracket identity visible. Naomi, the interrupted-save test is included. Those cases have not finished, so I cannot report the new monitor as verified.
16分Thanks for spelling out the timestamp, Jamie; I was wondering whether my old display problem was relevant or just familiar-looking
5分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .