Our bracket archive links the released failure and final pass, but the checking fixture is described only as bench nest. We have two backing arrangements in stores. Which original record would identify what the inspector actually used?
The UR5e bracket notes name no backing arrangement
AnnaChen1199 · 2026年3月12日 07:02 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
5 条回复
回复 AnnaChen1199
We recovered a checking arrangement from the inspector's marked setup sheet rather than the production traveller; ask for the applicable inspection method and any tooling issue or fitting record, with the bracket's drawing revision beside them.
19分Inspector has a marked sheet showing the taller backing arrangement. Stores can identify it. The shorter one is for another bracket variant
20分回复 AnnaChen1199
Have quality confirm whether the original released and final entries both used that arrangement before comparing their values, since finding the correct method does not by itself prove both checks followed it.
22分They confirmed the final check only. The first released entry lacks enough detail. We have withdrawn that numerical before-and-after comparison but kept the recorded correction operation
8分回复 AnnaChen1199
That leaves a clear limit on the old evidence; put the identified backing arrangement on the current study sheet so the next comparison does not start with the same stores puzzle.
18分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .