I've got our FR5 bezel samples in numbered sleeves, which is an improvement on my old loose-box approach, but the same bezel still gets called scratched or clean depending on how it sits under the light; what would you ask quality and the fixture person to check together?
Bezel references with a movable bright line
SamBennett0768 · 2025年7月18日 13:43 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
3 条回复
Have quality identify the actual surface condition under the agreed viewing method, while the fixture person checks how the bezel seats. Then repeat the camera views with the sample identity and seating recorded. Otherwise the two people can each solve a different problem and leave you with the same bad labels.
17分Quality accepts the bezel; the bright line has no matching reject feature on it, and the fixture person found it can tilt against one of the side contacts, so they're reviewing that seating before we collect more images.
17分Did the revised seating get tried, Sam? Interested whether the image changes reduced without losing visibility of your confirmed reject samples.
18分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .