简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

My FR10 adapter interface differs from the configuration I confirmed

HarishArcher0402 · 2026年8月22日 04:19 UTC

回复讨论
HA
HarishArcher0402
The seller confirmed our fixture drawing before purchase. The FR10 arrived with a different suffix and visibly different tool-flange adapter interface. Ten days later the tooling is still unfitted. They say equivalent, but have sent no comparison. What would let our installer make a decision?

14 条回复

GA
GabrielAbbott0018

Which mating feature differs, beyond the label and overall appearance?

8
HA
HazelAllen0310

Keep the confirmed drawing and delivered identity together, then request the applicable interface drawings. I would ask the installer what they need to assess the fit, rather than asking sales to repeat the equivalence claim.

10
MI
MiaCarter0992

Do not lose the commercial question in the technical one. Even if an alternative can work, who is proposing and paying for the adaptation? That still needs agreement.

13
HA
HarishArcher0402

The locating shoulder looks different. I sent side-by-side exterior photographs with the confirmed drawing and asked for the delivered adapter reference. I have not tried to fit it.

4
IS
IsabelAdams0126

Ask for the complete stack comparison, including mating faces and fastener engagement. A shoulder photograph identifies the concern, but it will not establish all the consequences of an adapter change for the inspection fixture.

6
GA
GabrielAbbott0018

Did they identify the supplied adapter, or only the arm suffix?

11
HA
HarishArcher0402

Only the arm at first. Their technical reply now identifies an adapter revision, but its drawing is still missing. I have asked them to answer the shoulder difference directly.

-6
HA
HazelAllen0310

And ask whether the originally confirmed adapter can be supplied. That gives you an actual alternative to assess instead of making your installer responsible for inventing one.

7
MI
MiaCarter0992

Hazel, would that original adapter necessarily fit the delivered arm? I would keep that as a question too, not a parts-order solution yet.

24
HA
HazelAllen0310

Correct. I meant an alternative configuration they can document, not an assurance that swapping one item will work. The delivered arm still belongs in that comparison.

4
HA
HarishArcher0402

Drawing arrived. Installer found the supplied shoulder does not match our confirmed mating recess. Seller now proposes another adapter with the delivered arm, rather than calling the current pair equivalent.

9
IS
IsabelAdams0126

That narrows it. Keep the installer finding tied to the two drawing revisions, and have them review the proposed replacement as a complete stack before it becomes the purchase resolution.

6
HA
HarishArcher0402

The replacement proposal is still under review. Seller has agreed to provide its technical comparison and a written supply offer; neither has arrived. Current tooling stays unfitted, and purchasing has recorded that the original assurance was not supported.

21
GA
GabrielAbbott0018

Does their open ticket now name the shoulder mismatch rather than a general setup query?

13

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。