I thought we had settled the polished-cover references for our UR5e camera proposal: quality accepted the plate with the moving bright band and identified a real scratch on another, yet the teaching export still calls that band a defect, so I need the current physical judgement carried into the images before anyone tunes against the old mistake.
Compare the source annotation and exported label for the identified cover. Does the wrong label already exist in the current source, or is the exporter restoring an older value?
Current source is correct; the teaching folder includes an older exported image with the same short filename, which gets picked up instead of the replacement.
Then find every place the lesson gets that image. We once corrected the master and still taught the old arrow from a local copy. Very efficient way to have the same argument twice.
Have the maintainer replace those references with an identified export and retain the source decision link. The same short filename should not choose between two different judgements.
And check the real scratch's image while they're in there. Fixing the falsely rejected cover shouldn't leave the actual reject pointing to another stale copy.
Both covers now link to the current export, with the physical identities and quality decisions visible; the scratch example was already current, but we checked it against the retained part too.
Covering tutor opened the lesson from their ordinary shortcut and located both regions on the actual covers without my commentary, so the copied-label fault is closed and the camera comparison can use the corrected set.