简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Our FR5 dashboard shows a mode after the status read fails

OmarAbbott0056 · 2025年8月28日 03:21 UTC

已关闭
OM
OmarAbbott0056
New SDK response shape, old wrapper. Failed read still shows a healthy-looking mode. Who should check the conversion?

12 条回复

DI
DineshAli0212

Can the software maintainer compare the supported version's documented success and failure replies with the wrapper's assumptions?

11
OM
OmarAbbott0056

Maintainer already found it treats the returned container as a success flag.

12
DI
DineshAli0212

Is the displayed mode taken from that failed reply, or retained from an earlier successful one?

18
BE
BenAdams0109

Either way, show people that the read failed. Keeping the last mode can be useful, but not when it sits there pretending to be fresh news.

6
OM
OmarAbbott0056

Earlier successful value. Failed reply has no usable mode.

18
DI
DineshAli0212

Then test the good-to-failed transition as well as each response separately, so the display cannot retain current status after the failed read.

14
OM
OmarAbbott0056

Added to maintainer's test list. Current dashboard isn't being used to decide cell operation.

10
IM
ImranAdams0131

Our wrapper once guessed a mode from a missing field. Include malformed replies too, with no fallback to a plausible operational state.

11
OM
OmarAbbott0056

Missing fields included. Unexpected shapes still need a case.

17
AA
AaronBrown0871

I would include startup before any valid reading, then a failed read after success and an unexpected response shape, checking that the operator can distinguish unavailable status from an actual reported mode in each case.

9
BE
BenAdams0109

Who owns updating those examples when the SDK changes again? Otherwise the wrapper and the tests can grow old together while agreeing beautifully.

9
OM
OmarAbbott0056

Software maintainer owns them with the version record. Test version marks stale and unavailable explicitly. Controller comparison remains outstanding.

14

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .