简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

pending does not tell me whether the FR10 verified this bracket

MeiBaker0516 · 2026年8月18日 11:49 UTC

回复讨论
ME
MeiBaker0516
Our application crashed after sending a fixture-verification request and before saving the result. FR10 may have continued while the local file stayed pending, then startup offered to resend it. I'm separating never-submitted from outcome-unknown, but the restart decision needs evidence behind those words, not just a better label.

14 条回复

JO
JoAli0244

What durable identity survives for this particular request on both sides?

6
ME
MeiBaker0516
回复 JoAli0244

The application kept a unique request identity before sending, and the receiver retains a result under that identity. Our startup helper ignored both and only checked pending. I've held its automatic resend while we review reconciliation.

3
KA
KaiBrooks0802

Check what the retained result means under the supported interface agreement before treating an identity match as completed verification.

10
JA
JamieBrooks0817

And make the held startup state visible while that lookup is running. Starting reconciliation should not briefly make the bracket appear ready for another request.

-2
HA
HazelChan1093

Could the same identifier be reused after reinstalling or restoring the application? I've seen a familiar number look much more convincing than its record deserved. Worth checking the identity lifetime before trusting a retained result.

24
ME
MeiBaker0516

The two software owners checked identity lifetime and the retained response contract. This result belongs to the original request and records completed verification. We can reconcile this case without resending; uncertain or missing identities will remain held.

12
JO
JoAli0244

Has that conclusion been saved durably, or is it only displayed after the lookup?

15
ME
MeiBaker0516
回复 JoAli0244

Saved and linked to the retained response, with no new verification request sent. The developer is now testing failure while saving that reconciliation so a second startup cannot treat it as untouched work.

18
KA
KaiBrooks0802

Keep the original interrupted local record in the audit history; reconciliation explains it rather than making the crash disappear.

12
JA
JamieBrooks0817

Does a failed reconciliation lookup leave a useful reason and escalation route, not just an indefinite spinner? The next shift shouldn't have to work out whether waiting longer is the approved response.

7
ME
MeiBaker0516

The offline tests now show held with a reason after failed lookup or failed save, and a saved reconciliation survives restart. The original request history is intact. Unknown cases have a named review route rather than a retry shortcut.

7
HA
HazelChan1093

That answers my identity concern for this case. Is the normal startup launcher using this version too, or are you still exercising the development copy?

8
ME
MeiBaker0516

Still the development copy. Normal-launch verification and the covering-maintainer exercise are the remaining tasks. The old bracket result is reconciled, but I'm leaving the general startup change short of release until those checks are done.

3
JO
JoAli0244

Please return with the normal-launch result. A recovered request and a released startup fix are different outcomes.

7

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。