Our FR10 cover-inspection images have travelling streaks. Same cover, different defect label. Who signs off this reference mess?
Why are we tuning around a scratch that moves?
JonasBrooks0807 · 2025年6月13日 22:03 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
5 条回复
Ask quality to judge the actual numbered cover first. Then keep that decision with the images. I'd use a couple of known samples to sort the lighting and seating before buying anything else.
6分Quality found a small edge mark, no long scratch. Image label combined both. Splitting those observations now.
5分Can you keep the edge mark visible in the next lighting comparison? Easy to celebrate losing the glare and miss that you've also hidden the thing you're supposed to detect.
17分It stays visible in the fixed sample shots. Reseating still changes glare. Fixture check next.
14分Did the fixture check explain the change? Curious whether the cover was seating differently or whether the proposed imaging is just very touchy about small presentation differences.
17分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .