简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
MiaBrown0905 · 2026年2月8日 00:20 UTC
Ask for the inspection scope and results tied to the offered assembly first; a condition adjective is cheap, and collection tends not to be.
6分Report received: visual checks and an unloaded run, with the arm and controller identified, but the pendant and cables are described only as included accessories.
17分Have those accessories identified before treating the package as complete. Also ask what repair work was done, known faults, and whether an independent inspection of the offered set is permitted before collection.
11分They permit an independent inspection and have supplied the accessory identities; repair history says external covers replaced, without a record of why, so that question is still open.
21分Include the tooling and integration scope in your cost comparison; a useful condition report on the supplied equipment still leaves your block-handling arrangement to be designed and checked.
6分Would the inspector be allowed to review the replaced-cover areas and any related service history, Mia, or are they only offering another unloaded demonstration?
19分Seller says the inspector may assess the supplied assembly, but the earlier service history is unavailable; I've asked our prospective inspector what they can usefully conclude within that limit before booking the visit.
1分That is a sensible question for the person doing the inspection. Keep the missing history explicit in any buying decision rather than asking an unloaded run to supply it.
7分Did the inspector offer a defined scope, or advise leaving this one? Interested which way that limitation took the decision.
15分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .