简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Can't choose sleeve pads from one clean-looking sample

VictorBennett0707 · 2025年7月16日 00:31 UTC

已关闭
VI
VictorBennett0707
Our FR5 sleeve-handling proposal has two pad samples on the bench. One leaves a clear contact line on the anodising; the softer one looks better, but the sleeve follows a finger slightly when released. I need a trial that covers the finish and the actual placement, not two different people declaring victory over different bits. Where would you start?

7 条回复

VI
VictorAllen0272

Get quality to judge the contact marks under the product's agreed viewing conditions, then have tooling show release into the real tray; a sleeve that sticks to a lovely soft pad is still a handling problem.

20
VI
VictorBennett0707

Quality has a permitted appearance sample we can use. The supplier's soft-pad test was on the bench without our tray, so I've asked for that release to be repeated in the actual receiving geometry.

0
VI
VictorAllen0272

Include the loaded hold and transfer in the same trial, otherwise they'll fix release by giving away the grip you need to get there.

4
CA
CallumAllen0273

Were the sleeves inspected before those pad tests, Victor Bennett, so you know which marks were already present?

0
VI
VictorBennett0707

Not the first pair, unfortunately. We have unhandled sleeves from the same supply now and quality will record their starting condition. Thank you for catching that.

10
CA
CallumAllen0273

Can the supplier identify which pad and handling sequence belongs to each returned sleeve?

11
VI
VictorBennett0707

Yes, they've agreed to label the samples and record the sequence. The combined trial is still pending. At least we are asking both pads to do the same job this time.

10

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .