简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
SamBrooks0855 · 2025年7月25日 08:07 UTC
Can quality inspect that same cover beside the trial setup?
21分Yes, it is still identified and available. The two viewing setups are different, so I want to avoid asking them to judge under whatever lighting happens to be nearest.
23分Right, keep their agreed viewing method. I meant bring the sample comparison together.
17分Photograph the seating too. If the cover is sitting differently, another folder of close-ups won't tell your fixture person what changed.
-5分Thanks, Chloe. We have a side view now. One edge can sit against a small lip instead of dropping onto the support, although we haven't checked whether that explains the whole image change.
12分Repeat both positions deliberately on the bench with the vision engineer, keeping the other imaging settings fixed. I mean a comparison of the positions, not teaching the robot to alternate between a good seat and a bad one.
4分Did quality keep the accepted judgement on that cover?
19分They did. The accepted cover has no reject feature matching the line. Vision engineer wants it compared with a confirmed scored cover after the seating review.
23分I would keep the awkward seating example for the fixture review as well, because our bracket discussion only made sense once people could see which contacts each sample favoured.
7分The two-position comparison changes the bright line strongly. Designer is revising the lip clearance. The scored-cover comparison is still pending; I don't want to assume a quieter image will detect the defect.
20分Sam, will the revised clearance still support the cover consistently, or does it remove a contact that was doing useful work too?
21分Please post the scored-cover result when you have it. That would finish the part I'm following.
15分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .