Refurbished Fairino FR10: what belongs in the acceptance check?

JackAbbott0080 · 2026年4月27日 10:24 UTC

回复讨论

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

JA
JackAbbott0080
A refurbished Fairino FR10 looks tempting for our parts tray unloading setup with a machined polymer puck in a small bench assembly area. The price is attractive and the listing says 'inspected', but i haven't seen the inspection scope. What should i ask for before paying to collect it?

16 条回复

JA
JamieBarnes0556

What has the seller actually supplied: a condition report, replacement list, or just the listing? Those answer different questions.

13分
JA
JackAbbott0080

@JamieBarnes0556 A replacement list. Nothing about the assemblies they left alone. Better than nothing, but 'inspected' is doing a lot of work here.

-2分
JA
JamieBarnes0556

@JackAbbott0080 Ask for a report tied to this unit and an itemised package list. Make purchase conditional on a qualified condition assessment and a representative demonstration.

24分
BR
BrunoAbbott0017

@JamieBarnes0556 I'm unsure how to read 'refurbished'. Does that description establish that the entire unit was assessed, or do you still need the detailed scope?

10分
JA
JamieBarnes0556

The label alone doesn't tell you what was checked. Ask for the actual scope, results and exclusions for the unit you're considering.

24分
IM
ImranBrown0914

@JamieBarnes0556 On my own used-arm purchase, the inventory caught a required cable missing from the bundle. Easy to price, annoyingly easy to overlook.

14分
JA
JackAbbott0080

@ImranBrown0914 Did you ask for photos of every item? Their bundle description is mostly 'complete system', which isn't helping me much.

16分
IM
ImranBrown0914

Photos helped with mine, alongside an itemised list. Have them identify the controller, pendant, cables and included software access rather than relying on the group photo.

13分
JA
JamieBarnes0556

A successful demonstration of your handling task should address the main condition uncertainty left after the paperwork review.

17分
VI
VictorAbbott0011

A demonstration doesn't settle the gap in the replacement list. Successfully handling something isn't a condition assessment of the assemblies that weren't replaced.

21分
JA
JamieBarnes0556

@VictorAbbott0011 Yes, I oversold it. The demo supports application suitability in that setup; it doesn't replace the qualified condition assessment you still need.

23分
JA
JackAbbott0080

i visited and saw normal movement and a successful transfer. We didn't see a backup restored, though. i'm keeping that blank on my checklist.

15分
BR
BrunoAbbott0017

@JackAbbott0080 What distinguishes having a backup from demonstrating recovery? I'm wondering whether simply checking that the file opens is enough.

15分
JA
JamieBarnes0556

The useful question is whether the system can recover its required configuration through the appropriate procedure. Ask the seller and assessor to define a controlled demonstration and identify the access it requires.

15分
JA
JackAbbott0080

@JamieBarnes0556 i still don't have enough to judge the condition or complete package. i'm not committing to collection on the strength of 'inspected'.

15分
JA
JamieBarnes0556

Fair enough. The inspection label hasn't supplied the missing condition and package information.

10分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 和 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。