简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

What counts as a confirmed defect on a reflective surface?

LeoAdams0101 · 2026年7月18日 11:36 UTC

回复讨论
LE
LeoAdams0101
We're planning presenting reflective components for surface inspection, with Universal Robots UR5e presenting a brushed stainless trim plate to a fixed camera in a cosmetic components workshop. Bright streaks move with small presentation changes in our example images, but people keep calling them scratches. We haven't commissioned the cell. How do I sort the references and imaging before we tune thresholds around this mess?

4 条回复

OM
OmarBarnes0578

@LeoAdams0101 Check whether the suspected scratches were confirmed on physical samples under the agreed appearance procedure. Link each image to its sample identity and inspection result first.

6
LE
LeoAdams0101

I've found that some labels were assigned from the images themselves. The samples are still available, but those labels have no corresponding physical inspection results, making the reference circular.

19
OM
OmarBarnes0578

Mark those labels uncertain and have the samples inspected properly. Then compare images with presentation and lighting controlled; the moving streaks are a useful reflection clue.

22
TH
ThomasCarter0973

@OmarBarnes0578 That clue needs a limit: presentation can also change how a real scratch appears. Movement in the image isn't enough to reclassify the sample as acceptable.

-7

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。