简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

FR5 tool-interface suffix differs from our confirmed fixture configuration

IsaacAbbott0085 · 2026年7月7日 01:21 UTC

回复讨论
IS
IsaacAbbott0085
The delivered FR5 configuration has a different suffix and a visibly different tool-interface bracket from the fixture drawing the seller confirmed. Tooling remains unfitted after 39 days of asking for a comparison. Their equivalent answer supplies no dimensions or scope. I need to determine what was delivered before accepting a fitting proposal.

3 条回复

SA
SarahCarter1024

Can the seller identify the delivered revision and compare its actual interface with the confirmed drawing, including the features which locate your tooling? A suffix difference alone does not describe either the consequence or the remedy.

19
IS
IsaacAbbott0085

They supplied the delivered revision drawing. Its locating shoulder is farther from the attachment face than on the confirmed configuration. Our toolmaker says the existing fixture interface does not match that arrangement; the seller has not yet offered defined replacement or return terms.

10
SA
SarahCarter1024

Then you have an identified compatibility problem, not merely an unexplained suffix. Does the seller propose supplying the confirmed configuration, or asking you to redesign around this one? Those costs and responsibilities need an answer before the tooling pause can end.

11

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。