The FR5 proposal reaches our aluminum blank with an arrow. Its gripper and the open machine door are absent. I have asked for the actual door survey before another arm comparison. What should the integrator show at the exchange, not just at the final pose?
Which complete-tool view should replace our FR5 fixture-exchange arrow?
ThomasBrooks0799 · 2026年1月25日 18:15 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
4 条回复
The complete held-blank assembly through approach and withdrawal, with opening and empty return where the intended sequence requires them, against the measured door and fixture; include the setter's access so the selected position does not solve the robot route by taking away the person's working space.
17分Survey and closed-tool drawing are with the integrator. The open fingers and rear connection are still undefined. Setter has also marked the fixture-change area on the same candidate.
23分Has the tool supplier named who will provide those missing assembly details, and does the integrator's review remain explicitly incomplete until they arrive?
10分Tool designer is named. The request lists open fingers and rear connection individually, and the access decision remains open. No complete-route result is being inferred from the closed-tool drawing.
14分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .