Our UR5e spacer tray behaves until we use the other tray

JonasChan1068 · 2025年12月17日 23:11 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

JO
JonasChan1068
New locator helped the first tray. Replacement tray missed. I'm dropping fixed from the trial note.

18 条回复

AL
AlexAdams0124

Keep the improvement in it too. Which tray and which observed change?

11分
LO
LouisBell0659

Who prepared the trays during the successful runs, Jonas?

10分
JO
JonasChen1155

Our replacement recess was outside its drawing requirement; have you compared yours, rather than assume the new locator itself is wrong?

13分
JO
JonasChan1068

Alex, first tray seated without the old sideways shuffle. Louis, I prepared it. JonasChen, not measured yet.

12分
IM
ImranAllen0305

You can describe that observed improvement now, with the preparation you supplied, while leaving the replacement-tray problem open. It does not have to be either a universal fix or a useless modification.

20分
AI
AishaBell0692

Our night shift once got a locator instruction that assumed everyone knew where to push the tray. The author had done every trial. Let the eventual loader try the seating check before it becomes routine.

19分
JA
JamieAllen0295

Aisha, exactly; the designer's practiced hands are an unlisted fixture component in a lot of demonstrations

15分
AA
AaronBrown0871

That operator comparison is useful, but the replacement tray still needs its physical discrepancy checked; a clearer instruction cannot compensate for a tray that does not meet the intended locating geometry.

9分
WA
Warren_Blair

Aaron, agreed. I'd keep both jobs visible in the handover. Otherwise one team will wait for a better instruction and the other will wait for new hardware, and neither will own the next trial.

8分
JO
JonasChan1068

Tooling has both trays and the missed spacer now. Shift trainer owns the loading check with them.

5分
LO
LouisCarter1007

Ask tooling to define the acceptable tray interface from the intended assembly drawing. A comparison between two trays may reveal a difference without establishing which geometry the locator is meant to accept.

5分
JA
JasperBrown0899

Has the replacement been measured yet, Jonas?

8分
JO
JonasChan1068

Yes. One locating recess is shallow against the drawing. Supplier reviewing replacement; no trial result.

18分
JO
JonasChen1155

Keep that result tied to the measured tray; our spare-tray checks remained open after finding the first bad recess.

21分
AL
AlexAdams0124

And did the ordinary loader try the first tray without your help?

16分
JO
JonasChan1068

Not yet. Check is planned, not done. First-tray result still describes my supervised setup.

16分
JA
JamieAllen0295

Thanks for saying that plainly; the next reader can follow what improved without inheriting an independence claim nobody tested

6分
AI
AishaBell0692

Will you put the eventual replacement and loader results in the same note? That would help the other shift see whether the changeover instruction actually covers the trays they receive.

15分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .