I was collecting training pictures of our brushed trim plates and a horrible bright line disappeared when I moved the spare-parts rack behind the camera. We're planning UR5e presentation to that camera. I now have a folder of rejects that might mostly be reflections, and I'll be the one explaining it to evening shift.
The scratch vanishes when I move the sample rack
LeahAli0234 · 2024年12月9日 00:15 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
5 条回复
回复 LeahAli0234
Have you still got the actual plates that produced those pictures? Start with a few identifiable pieces and have quality examine them. Keep their judgement separate from the bright-line labels. Otherwise you could build a beautifully consistent test for the wrong feature.
12分I kept four of them in numbered sleeves. Quality found a real scuff on one, but it runs across the brush direction and isn't where our bright line was. The other three are acceptable to them.
19分回复 LeahAli0234
Use those as an initial reference set, with quality's locations marked on a separate image. Photograph each repeatedly in your intended presentation. Include the surrounding rack position in your setup notes; it has already shown that the environment changes the result.
9分We've already done a static repeat set this morning with a screen around the station. The big false line is gone. The real scuff still isn't consistently visible, so I'm keeping this out of the operator pass/fail instructions for now.
16分回复 LeahAli0234
That is a useful stopping point. Suppressing a reflection has not demonstrated scuff detection. Give the vision person the accepted pieces and the scuffed piece together, and ask for an imaging trial before anybody chooses the threshold.
20分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .