Who should complete our FR10 brass-blank withdrawal model?

The integrator, Daniel, though it says the toolmaker has not supplied the full model and the machine owner has not confirmed the door geometry.

Then give those missing inputs named owners and keep the arm choice provisional. The integrator can coordinate the comparison without pretending the missing dimensions are harmless.

Victor, the setter's access is only a standing-position circle at present; I've asked for the actual fixture-removal route and trolley space.

The trolley needs to turn, not just park.

And who checks the tool connections behind the body?

The toolmaker is adding those, Daniel; Imran, the setter will check the turn with the machine owner rather than treat the parked outline as enough.

Has the integrator received the revised inputs yet, Clara? A list of promised models can start sounding like a completed review after a few emails.

Full tool model received, Caleb; surveyed door geometry still outstanding, so the combined review remains incomplete.

Use the available model to identify questions, but do not credit a stand with clearance based on the old opening. That distinction belongs in the purchasing update too.

Purchasing has that limitation and has not released the stand; the tool model raises a possible exit conflict which the door survey needs to settle.

Did the survey settle it?

Survey arrived and the first exit route does conflict; the integrator is comparing another approach from the same base, with the setter route retained, but has not returned a complete alternative.