简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
AmaraBrooks0861 · 2026年1月5日 21:56 UTC
Recover identities only where you've got a real link. I've seen a tray order reconstructed from somebody's memory and then treated as measurement evidence. Mark the unmatched readings as unmatched, and start the next comparison with each blank identified.
13分Two photographs show readable labels beside the readings. The rest are just a list. Those two blanks are still available, but overall lengths were never entered.
3分We had that list once, and everybody remembered the order differently; I'd keep the two traceable examples and stop asking the other readings to tell you which blank was long
4分Nora, yes. Amara, have the setter and quality agree overall length, relevant end condition, seating reference and exposed-length method for the identified blanks. Then repeat seating can be compared on the same blank rather than mixing blank variation into it.
1分And keep the measurements before and after any approved preparation linked to the blank, otherwise a cleaned-up end becomes an unexplained improvement
17分Setter and quality checked the two retained blanks. One had material left on its seating end and did not sit as intended. They've kept the before check and marked the old unlinked readings unusable for this comparison. New identified set next.
21分Useful finding. Include ordinary conforming blanks in that set as well as the troublesome example. Otherwise you'll learn plenty about this one end defect and very little about normal seating variation.
14分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .