I am reviewing the reference images for a planned FR5 bezel inspection station. A bright streak moves between views, but each image calls it a scratch. We still have the bezels.
What should quality establish on the physical samples before we pay for a larger image collection? I do not want to buy more examples of an unverified label.
Conflicting scratch labels on our bezel images
OscarBennett0706 · 2025年5月15日 14:17 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
4 条回复
Ask them to identify the actual marks and judge them under the agreed appearance check, with each decision tied to its bezel; then you'll know what the camera is meant to find.
11分They found a nick on one bezel and no scratch where the bright streak appears. We have recorded the nick location and retained that sample for the imaging trial.
20分Does that nick fail the appearance check?
22分Could you keep the camera and lighting positions with those images too? I've seen a comparison lose its value because nobody knew what had moved between shots.
11分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .