简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Which old measurements can actually guide our fixture review?

PavelBrown0875 · 2026年5月18日 06:54 UTC

回复讨论
PA
PavelBrown0875
I'm reviewing historical records for our planned planning repeatable welding of bracket assemblies with Fairino FR5 and a fabricated gusseted mounting bracket in a small steel assemblies factory. The notes describe alignment under restraint but dimensions outside the drawing requirement after release. I'd like to distinguish incoming fit-up, fixture location and final acceptance before carrying an unexplained correction routine into the new cell; no live welding adjustments are involved.

3 条回复

LE
LeahAli0234

@PavelBrown0875 Does the inspection procedure define the released condition and reference supports? Check that alongside whether each old measurement says how the assembly was held.

14
PA
PavelBrown0875

My sheets contain both restrained and released results, with some conditions unlabelled. Although the drawing specifies the dimension, the inspection procedure doesn't clearly define the supports.

4
LE
LeahAli0234

Have quality and the drawing owner define the acceptance condition. Group the old results by known measurement state; that should make them comparable.

21

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。