Our FR10 loading picture leaves the gripper outside the doorway

Setter has marked their fixture-change route. Tool supplier has a body drawing but no adapter depth. The surveyor is measuring the actual door position rather than using the machine brochure.

That is useful, but make the adapter an explicit decision in the review. If the supplier offers two depths, compare two identified assemblies rather than one hopeful block. The blank's grip position matters too; moving it in the drawing changes both the envelope and the held-load arrangement. I would ask the integrator for the unresolved inputs before asking for a clearance verdict. It is possible to make progress by ruling out an obstruction or defining a candidate without pretending the whole route is ready.

Two adapter options are now identified, Lucy. I asked for the held blank at each proposed grip depth. No assembly selected, but at least we know what is being compared.

Do both show open fingers at release, not just the closed loading approach?

And keep the setter's route attached when those views return. The tool alternatives and people need the same space; separate drawings can each look entirely reasonable until someone lays one over the other.