the trim plate has become its own reject example

NoahBennett0716 · 2025年8月10日 15:44 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

NO
NoahBennett0716
I've found the same stainless trim plate in our good and bad image folders. Same little dent on the back, different bright stripe on the front. We're preparing an FR10 camera station and somebody has already started tuning against these folders. I don't think renaming the pictures will be enough. Has anyone untangled this without throwing away the useful examples too?

17 条回复

PR
PriyaCarter1003

Stop using the folder names as labels for now. Who actually looked at the plates? If those names came from somebody squinting at thumbnails, you've got an image-sorting exercise masquerading as inspection.

20分
NO
NoahBennett0716

A trainee sorted them from photos. The quality lead checked some plates, but nobody linked those decisions back to individual pictures.

7分
PR
PriyaCarter1003

Then I'd keep the pictures and start the labels again with the quality lead. Include awkward accepted plates, not just lovely clean ones. Otherwise the first ordinary finish variation will look like a crisis.

10分
LU
LuisChan1130

Are the physical plates still around?

14分
NO
NoahBennett0716

Yes. In a drawer, fortunately.

21分
AN
AnikaBennett0769

Put an ID on the back and photograph that separately, then link the front views. Cheap filing work, but it stops one shiny object acquiring three personalities

14分
PR
PriyaCarter1003

And repeat the seating. We had this come up in another image discussion: careful labelling doesn't rescue a picture taken with the plate leaning differently each time.

17分
NO
NoahBennett0716

We tried the drawer samples in a locating nest. That big stripe still moves when the light position changes. One actual scored plate loses its visible mark at some positions too, which complicates the easy answer I wanted.

14分
LI
LinCarter0966

Who chose which scored plate counts as a reject?

16分
NO
NoahBennett0716

Our quality lead, against the customer's cosmetic examples. It's sample S6 in the new list.

5分
LI
LinCarter0966

Good. Keep S6 when comparing lights, even if the clean plates look better without it.

16分
PR
PriyaCarter1003

That's the annoying tradeoff. A flatter-looking image can be easier to threshold and worse at showing the thing you care about. Have you got the faint rejects in there as well as S6?

10分
AN
AnikaBennett0769

I'd leave the disputed samples in a separate pile, too. No need to turn a disagreement into a confident label just to fill a folder

13分
NO
NoahBennett0716

Two faint rejects now included. We've also got three the inspectors disagree on. Those aren't going into tuning yet. Thanks for the back-label suggestion, Anika; we caught another duplicated plate that way.

23分
LU
LuisChan1130

Will the next shift get the actual samples, or only the pictures?

13分
NO
NoahBennett0716

Both. The samples have a storage tray now, with the image list beside it. Lighting choice is still pending; we have one arrangement that hides less but gives us a very bright edge.

9分
PR
PriyaCarter1003

How did that edge behave on the faint rejects? I'm interested in what you settle on, especially if it doesn't require a second presentation for every plate.

6分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .