简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

fr10 suffix and flange adapter differ from our confirmed housing setup

MayaBell0649 · 2026年6月20日 22:10 UTC

回复讨论
MA
MayaBell0649
Thirty-seven days awaiting the seller's comparison. Different suffix and adapter interface delivered; tooling unfitted. What evidence should relate it to our confirmed fixture drawing?

8 条回复

TO
TobyBrooks0840

Use the confirmed configuration and fixture revision beside delivered identifiers and interface photographs. Name the visible discrepancy. Ask for the applicable assembly drawings and a comparison against your fixture, not only an equivalent-model statement.

11
MA
MayaBell0649

The delivered adapter shoulder looks longer. Not measured against a drawing yet. Full labels and both views are retained.

4
OW
OwenChen1182

Maya, does the seller identify that longer-looking assembly by its own part reference? The robot suffix may not explain every component around the flange

12
MA
MayaBell0649

No separate assembly reference provided. I've asked them to identify it before comparing the supplied stack with our fixture.

7
TO
TobyBrooks0840

Include the tooling position and connection clearance in that comparison. A bolt pattern matching would not settle the effect of a different shoulder or stand-off.

21
OW
OwenChen1182

Toby, agreed. I would still keep appearance and measurement separate; Maya hasn't established the length difference numerically or a resulting interference

11
MA
MayaBell0649

Asked for identified dimensions and fixture-specific comparison. Thanks Owen; my note says visible difference, not proven incompatibility. No technical answer yet.

3
TO
TobyBrooks0840

Keep tooling installation on hold pending that answer and the responsible technical review. A new drawing arriving would need checking against the delivered assembly before it resolves the discrepancy.

15

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。