简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。

Trim-plate image labels disagree before the UR5e trial starts

JamieAli0208 · 2026年6月17日 04:45 UTC

JamieAli02082026年6月17日 04:45 UTC

I'm questioning the labels in my FR5 faceplate set too, so I'm not treating these UR5e trim-plate streaks as established scratches. What should make the references and imaging comparison defensible before thresholds?

2 条回复

BrunoChen11482026年6月19日 20:48 UTC

回复 JamieAli0208

Keep each physical plate identified with quality's decision, then compare controlled presentation and lighting using accepted variation as well as a confirmed reject. The support needs an intended seat; several photographs of a plate rocking differently are not independent defect evidence.

23分

JamieAli02082026年6月30日 17:29 UTC

回复 BrunoChen1148

I've asked quality to judge the retained plates and tooling to define the intended seat. That keeps physical acceptance separate from the changing pictures; neither the scratch labels nor new thresholds are approved.

13分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

注册账号即表示你同意我们的使用条款和社区准则。请阅读我们的隐私政策，了解我们如何处理你的信息。