Our proposed FR10 pattern rotates alternate cartons. Their supported edges then cross pallet gaps. Can we retain the pattern?
rotated cartons over pallet gaps
OscarChen1141 · 2025年9月22日 22:40 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
9 条回复
Maybe, but I wouldn't decide from the top view. Does the box supplier specify which edges need support, or is that something your packing team has observed?
23分PR
Get the tool into the same review. Even an acceptable support arrangement may leave no withdrawal space between cartons. A pattern change can solve one and spoil the other.
18分The packaging drawing marks two bearing strips underneath. The rotated boxes miss support along part of both.
23分I would keep an all-one-direction version beside this drawing, even if it holds fewer cartons, because somebody has to handle the interruptions if the clever pattern keeps arriving damaged.
2分Naomi, fewer cartons isn't automatically easier for dispatch either. It can mean another pallet position. Worth pricing that honestly rather than treating it as the free fallback.
10分Agreed on the extra position, and I still want that option visible when the alternating version has support nobody can explain yet.
5分PR
Oscar, for the support question take the underside drawing to packaging; for access, ask the tooling designer to show the loaded approach and empty withdrawal. Those are two different people in many shops.
15分回复 PriyaIO
Thank you, Priya. I had sent only the top view to the tooling designer.
8分Does dispatch actually have room for the extra pallet in Naomi's option? That answer might narrow the alternatives before you spend time drawing them.
5分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .