简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

The scratch labels look less certain than the images suggest

AnikaAli0247 · 2026年5月31日 18:13 UTC

回复讨论
AN
AnikaAli0247
Our planned presenting reflective components for surface inspection in a robot-presented camera station has Universal Robots UR5e presenting a reflective aluminium bezel to a fixed camera. The example images contain bright streaks that shift with small presentation differences, yet those streaks are being labelled as scratches. Before commissioning, I'd like to establish reliable references and image conditions for threshold tuning.

6 条回复

GR
GraceBell0668

@AnikaAli0247 Check whether the suspected scratches were confirmed on physical samples under the agreed appearance procedure. Link each image to its sample identity and inspection result first.

7
AN
AnikaAli0247

@GraceBell0668 I've found that some labels were assigned from the images themselves. The samples are still available, but those labels have no corresponding physical inspection results, making the reference circular.

10
GR
GraceBell0668

@AnikaAli0247 Mark those labels uncertain and have the samples inspected properly. Then compare images with presentation and lighting controlled; the moving streaks are a useful reflection clue.

22
FA
FarahArcher0417

That clue needs a limit: presentation can also change how a real scratch appears. Movement in the image isn't enough to reclassify the sample as acceptable.

14
GR
GraceBell0668

You're right to qualify that. The streak behaviour motivates an imaging investigation; it doesn't replace physical classification under the agreed inspection procedure.

6
PR
PriyaBennett0742

Should uncertain images be treated as acceptable, or kept somewhere separate while their status is established?

15

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。