Bezel reject cards with no rejected feature marked

Quality took them. They say one has an unacceptable edge rub, nowhere near its red circle. The other is accepted. I've pulled both old cards from the draft lesson.

Use the edge rub's real location in the next comparison. Don't quietly replace the red circle with another one and leave the capture conditions unexplained; you still need a view that actually shows that rub.

We once printed replacement examples while the old ones were still in the training folder. Guess which got used. Give the approved set one obvious home and withdraw the old labels properly.

Done, Sofia. New set isn't approved yet, so the lesson points to the current manual appearance check. Camera owner is checking views of the same identified bezels.

What moves between captures? The bezel in its holder, the holder itself, or the light? A red circle won't answer that either.

Chloe, did the camera owner work through Ben's movement question? Curious whether the rub stays visible when your actual presentation varies, not just in the most convincing still.

Ben and Priya, the bezel rocks in the prototype holder while the lamp stays fixed. The rub fades in some views. Tooling is checking the support points.

Holder proposal is back. No repeat image results yet. Thanks, Sofia, for the folder warning; someone did ask me to send the old cards while they waited.

That request sounds familiar. Give them a clear reason the cards were withdrawn, so waiting for the new ones does not become permission to resurrect the old ones.