One bracket, two accepted ticks

RebeccaChan1126 · 2025年9月23日 04:47 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

RE
RebeccaChan1126
Our FR10 bench accepted a sample bracket once. Then the reporting application lost its connection and came back with a second accepted tick. Same bracket still in the fixture, no new inspection. Very productive software. I've got the saved messages from that interruption. The completion was high on both sides of the gap. Can we make the reporting sensible without clearing the PLC state just to get a clean-looking screen?

20 条回复

NO
NoahChen1151

Yes, but first find out whether the second tick is only on the screen or has become another stored result. I'd start with the saved entries for that bracket, not change the PLC.

6分
SO
SofiaBell0630

What does an operator do with an accepted tick on this bench? If it releases paperwork or tells them to unload, the display wording matters as much as the total.

18分
RE
RebeccaChan1126

It's the inspection report screen. Unloading is separate. Two saved rows have the same job reference and result, but different arrival times. The report adds both.

4分
LI
LiamArcher0403

Could the report count the job once instead of counting arrivals?

18分
NO
NoahChen1151

Liam, that sounds right if the job reference is unique for every inspection attempt. Rebecca, can the same bracket be inspected again with the same reference? That is where a simple duplicate filter can lose a real result.

2分
HE
HenryBaker0438

Does a failed inspection stay visible when the bracket is inspected again?

17分
RE
RebeccaChan1126

Noah, the reference is our worksheet number and gets reused for a recheck. Henry, the failed row stays, then the recheck adds another row. So counting each worksheet once would throw useful stuff away.

19分
LI
LiamArcher0403

Ah, yes. I meant each inspection, not each worksheet. Thanks for catching that.

19分
SO
SofiaBell0630

I'd keep the failed inspection and the recheck separate on the screen too. Someone reviewing a bracket needs to see why there are two results, not guess which row is the accidental repeat.

21分
NO
NoahChen1151

You need an attempt identity that survives the connection dropping. New inspection attempt, new identity. Repeated delivery of the same attempt, same result entry. The worksheet can remain the link between them.

3分
HE
HenryBaker0438

Sofia, would you put the earlier failure beside the accepted recheck or behind a history button?

23分
SO
SofiaBell0630

Beside it on an inspection report, Henry. Perhaps collapsed details, but not a hidden failure. On a small operator screen I might do it differently because they have another immediate job to do.

17分
RE
RebeccaChan1126

Our developer has made an offline version with separate attempt IDs. Replaying my interruption adds one result. A deliberate recheck adds another and both stay linked to the worksheet. This is much closer to what I thought we already had.

16分
NO
NoahChen1151

Who assigns the attempt ID in that version? If the reporting application creates a fresh one when it sees completion after reconnect, you'll get the same fault with a nicer column name.

19分
RE
RebeccaChan1126

The inspection job creates it before starting, and the captured completion carries it. The reporting side doesn't invent it. We haven't tested a restart of the job side yet.

11分
LI
LiamArcher0403

And the old failure is still there?

11分
RE
RebeccaChan1126

Yes, Liam. Failed first attempt, accepted recheck, two rows. Sofia's suggestion helped: the worksheet heading groups them without pretending the failure never happened.

3分
HE
HenryBaker0438

Did anyone who reads the actual reports try that grouped view?

14分
SO
SofiaBell0630

Henry's question is worth doing before spending ages tidying it. I've watched people read only the big green heading and miss the earlier failure underneath. The grouping needs clear result labels, not just colour.

22分
NO
NoahChen1151

The restart case is still the one I'd put next in testing. Include a result saved just before the reporting side stops, then delivered again afterwards. That's a very ordinary way to get the duplicate back.

15分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .