简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
LinCarter0966 · 2026年6月30日 15:19 UTC
Which pictured regions have actually been judged under the appearance requirement, Lin? I would keep their physical locations and plate identities separate from the image captions, then use confirmed accepted and rejected examples in the presentation comparison
12分No approved decisions yet. Plates retained and numbered; captions came from our image discussion, not quality.
7分Keep the captions out of training until that changes. I've just had to do that with a draft deck: a confident arrow gets copied far more easily than the uncertainty somebody mentioned during the meeting.
5分Quality accepted the broad streak on one plate and rejected a shallow groove on another. Regions recorded. Holder comparison remains pending.
12分Then the next question is whether the agreed groove is visible across the intended presentations while accepted finish remains distinguishable. Include repeated seating and recorded lighting, not just the most flattering photograph of each plate
18分Who will keep the physical plates available for the trainer, Lin? The person taking over needs to relate a new observation to the actual reference, not only a cropped image and a remembered explanation.
11分