Same drawing requirement at both checks?
简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。
Bracket passes under clamps, fails on the inspection bench
GraceCarter1016 · 2025年9月26日 21:05 UTC
14 条回复
Yes. Same hole-spacing requirement, but the restrained check used fixture pins as its reference.
19分Then why is the proposal calling that final acceptance when the drawing check happens after release?
15分It may be a planning shortcut rather than an inspection decision, Oscar. Still needs correcting, since it could hide the labour between welding and an accepted bracket.
3分Grace, is correction work included anywhere in the old job cost?
18分One labour total. Welding, checking and correction all rolled together. No split.
7分Maya, yes, I was blaming the wording rather than the inspector; the proposal is what Grace says borrows the check
21分Don't let them call that whole total welding time then. We once planned a changeover from a number that also contained waiting for inspection. It made every later comparison look odd.
6分You can still use the combined old total as a whole-job comparison if its start and finish are clear. You just cannot claim to have isolated the welding saving from it.
5分Maya, would you leave the missing split blank rather than estimate it?
9分I have removed the under-clamp check from final acceptance. Quality will define the released check.
6分Alex, an estimate can help planning if its source and uncertainty stay visible. I would not fill empty historical columns with it and pretend those were measured task times.
15分Thanks Maya, that's a useful distinction for our sheets too. We keep estimates beside actuals and then forget which is which in the summary.
11分Grace, will somebody time the separate steps in the eventual trial?
15分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .