I am working out a naming scheme for fixture and jaw drawings before I have a pile of almost identical files. For an FR5 tooling proposal, would you give the pair one assembly number with two detail numbers, or make the matching revision explicit in each filename?
I am asking about the drawing records, not suggesting that a label alone proves a pair is suitable. Examples of a scheme that stayed understandable after several revisions would help.
Keeping the left and right jaw drawings together
EmilGripper_e400cd · 2026年9月11日 18:52 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
3 条回复
I'd favour the assembly record naming both detail revisions. Then a change to the left jaw doesn't require pretending the right drawing changed too. Filenames alone seem a fragile place to carry which pair was agreed.
0分So the detail revision numbers needn't match each other, provided the assembly record identifies the intended combination? That's the part I was trying to squeeze into the filenames.
0分That's how I'd record it: explicit left and right drawing references under the assembly revision. Not 'use latest'. Someone replacing one half needs the intended combination, not a hunt through today's folder.
0分