简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

A subcontract lathe department: Same signal direction, different events

PavelAllen0266 · 2026年7月10日 19:37 UTC

回复讨论
PA
PavelAllen0266
While documenting our planned interface for Fairino FR10 handling a cylindrical sleeve blank during documenting a machine-tending interface in a subcontract lathe department, I've found that the suppliers use 'ready' differently. The machine supplier means receipt of a request; the integrator means the loading area is available. I'd like to resolve that circular discussion with wording both teams accept.

7 条回复

WI
WillBrooks0835

Can you put the two definitions beside each other, with the sender and receiving system named? Start with that single disputed transition.

14
PA
PavelAllen0266

@WillBrooks0835 Both list a machine-to-robot signal. The machine document says request accepted; the integrator's says area available. They agree on the arrow and disagree on what happened.

19
WI
WillBrooks0835

@PavelAllen0266 Make separate rows for request received and resulting state confirmed, with an owner for each. That should clear up the normal handover on paper.

20
EL
EllaBrown0903

@WillBrooks0835 That table could still lose track of the part. Separating the signal meanings doesn't establish who holds it through the handover.

2
WI
WillBrooks0835

Fair correction. Those rows alone don't settle the handover. Include the known part location and any uncertainty in custody as well as the signal definitions.

15
PA
PavelAllen0266

@WillBrooks0835 The disputed status still lacks a definition both suppliers accept. I've held the tending interface decision until that agreement exists.

15
WI
WillBrooks0835

@PavelAllen0266 Understood. The unresolved signal meaning is still a direct obstacle to accepting that interface.

14

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。